Skip to main content
powered help
header-left header-center header-right
File #: 251889    Version: 0
Type: Resolution-Immediate Adoption Status: Introduced
File created: 3/3/2026 In control: COMMON COUNCIL
On agenda: Final action:
Effective date:    
Title: Resolution expressing opposition to the Wisconsin Electric Power Company proposal before the Public Service Commission.
Sponsors: ALD. DIMITRIJEVIC, ALD. STAMPER, ALD. BAUMAN, ALD. BROWER
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultTallyAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

IMMEDIATE ADOPTION


Number

251889

Version

ORIGINAL

Reference

 

Sponsor

ALD. DIMITRIJEVIC, STAMPER, BAUMAN AND BROWER

Title

Resolution expressing opposition to the Wisconsin Electric Power Company proposal before the Public Service Commission.

Analysis

This resolution expresses opposition to the Wisconsin Electric Power Company’s current proposal before the Public Service Commission. Further, the resolution advocates that large data center customers pay 100% of all incremental and fixed costs required to serve them, that enforceable, long-term protections be in place so Wisconsin ratepayers are not left responsible if data center plans change or demand falls, and that the electricity use threshold that triggers these protections be set low enough to prevent avoidance by data center operators.

Body

Whereas, The Wisconsin Electric Power Company has requested that the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin approve a proposal that would establish a very large customer and bespoke resources tariff system, in the context of providing electricity to customers such as data centers; and

 

Whereas, The Executive Director of the Citizens Utility Board of Wisconsin has identified aspects of the proposal that put average customers at risk of paying additional costs to support the electricity and infrastructure needs of large data centers; and

 

Whereas, A utility auditor for the Public Service Commission testified that, under the terms of the proposal, if a data center uses less power than expected or terminates service early, average customers could be charged for plant and fuel costs associated with the data center; and

 

Whereas, A utility financial analyst for the Public Service Commission testified that the proposed 10-year term of the tariff would not recover all long-term costs that a data center may cause the utility to incur; and

 

Whereas, The proposal sets the tariff eligibility threshold at 500 megawatts of forecasted annual electric load; and

 

Whereas, Data centers described as “hyperscale” are being built elsewhere that are forecasted to consume less energy annually than the proposed threshold; now, therefore, be it

 

Resolved, By the Common Council of the City of Milwaukee, that the City of Milwaukee is opposed to the very large customer and bespoke resources tariff proposal that the Wisconsin Electric Power Company has submitted to the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin; and, be it

 

Further Resolved, That the City of Milwaukee advocates that large data center customers should pay 100% of all incremental and fixed costs required to serve them, including generation capacity, operations and maintenance, and fuel costs attributable to serving the data center load; and, be it

 

Further Resolved, That the City of Milwaukee advocates that the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin adopt enforceable, long-term protections such as binding service agreements aligned with the life of new infrastructure, exit and termination charges, and other safeguards so Wisconsin ratepayers are not left responsible if data center plans change or demand falls; and, be it

 

Further Resolved, That the City of Milwaukee advocates that the annual electricity use threshold that defines a “very large customer” and triggers the requirement to pay 100% of all incremental and fixed costs required to serve them be set low enough to prevent avoidance by data center operators.

 

Requestor

 

Drafter

LRB181458-1

Dave Gelting

February 26, 2026