| | | | Please join the meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/861172293
or by phone: (872) 240-3311
Access Code: 861-172-293
| | | |
|
Not available
|
| | 1. | | Roll Call and Introductions.
Minutes note: Attendees: Geroge Martiin, Jennifer Evans, Keving Muhs, Tonya Fonseca, Ted Kraig, Marissa Meyer, Celia Jackson, James Davies, Pam Ritger, Dennis Grezezinski, Akira Mabon, Susanna Cain | | | |
|
Not available
|
| | 3. | | Scope and Time Table for the Work Group
Milestones for work groups and C&E plan adoption, per Project Charter:
o Jan 2021 – Work group memberships finalized and begin work
o March 2021 – Produce “menu” of financing strategies
o May 2021 – Prioritize financing ideas and coalesce around one big idea
o Aug -Oct 2021 – Prioritize and refine financing proposals
o Dec 2021 – Bring Climate & Equity Plan framework to City Council and County Board for adoption
o May 2022 – Government agencies request funding for proposed programs
o July 2022 – Plan drafted
o Sept 2022 – Plan adopted
o Nov 2022 – Plan elements funded as part of City and County Budgets
o Jan 2023 and following – Programs and policies implemented
Minutes note: Focus on one strategy that has big impact now, can be built on further to reach goals.
Questions:
1. All members are coming from different backgrounds, how can we work together to be sure that we are in sync and work towards a common goal.
a. Is there processes that we can use to coalesce and understand our carrying priorities?
b. Celia may be able to look into this.
2. Outreach – not listed on timeline
a. Education and outreach is a separate workgroup that will provide recommendations for other groups on how to reach out to the community
b. George Martin is a member of the education and outreach workgroup and can provide updates later.
| | | |
|
Not available
|
| | 4. | | Goals and Outputs – Review Work Group Template. | | | |
|
Not available
|
| | 5. | | Meeting Logistics, Time Commitments, Meeting Schedule.
Minutes note: • Note taker for each meeting
o How to assign, rotate, google doc, etc.
o Tanya and Matt agreed to help with notes, prefer rotation with other members
• How to include input from public that may join meeting
o Designated time for public input in the beginning of the meeting and additional questions at the end
o George: 2 minutes for public to comment and response from members. Additional question as time allows at the end of meeting
o All in agreement that some limitation is needed to avoid meetings being derailed.
o Education and outreach workgroup has goal to get community feedback
? Consensus: 2 minute open public comment to begin meeting, additional time at the end of meeting for additional public comment/questions. Allows for meeting to stay on schedule and still have open time for public input.
• Open meeting reminders – workgroup is subject to open meeting laws
o Must avoid walking quorum – larger subset so the workgroup meeting outside of public scrutiny.
? Smaller groups can email and correspond but not larger subsets of the workgroup
• Meeting Frequency
o Guiding document recommends once per month
? Group consensus to meet twice per month to start
? Poll to be sent out for a regular day and time
• Agenda
o Agenda to list items that need to be finalized/decision made during that meeting to increase urgency and preparation
| | | |
|
Not available
|
| | 6. | | Initial Brainstorm Potential Big Ideas
Minutes note: Open time to discuss “Big Idea”
• Ted’s planning document
o City Wide EV plan
? Infrastructure ordinance
? Working with utility
• MG&E program that reduces upfront cost for home chargers
• Incentivize places of work to have chargers
o Personal vehicle discouragement
? Increased parking charges, zoning, reduction in parking, parking policy
• Additional revenues put towards transit
• Be aware of parking changes and replace with other transit, consider equity impacts.
• Dynamic fees to avoid equity impacts.
• Be aware of how fees may impact travel to jobs and understand where jobs are located. Alternative Transportation must be available before personal passenger vehicles can be discouraged.
• Inclusion of other municipalities in the county – over parked generally in the county. Developers often are opposed to larger parking requirements that exceed need.
o Transit hubs
? Multiple modes of transit, walkability, biking,
? Awareness of emissions from EV’s – production, wear, additional emissions
| | | |
|
Not available
|