powered help
header-left header-center header-right
File #: 090791    Version: 0
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 10/13/2009 In control: ZONING, NEIGHBORHOODS & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
On agenda: Final action: 11/3/2009
Effective date:    
Title: Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the Project Plan for Tax Incremental District No. 56, Erie/Jefferson Street Riverwalk, in the 4th Aldermanic District.
Sponsors: THE CHAIR
Indexes: TAX INCREMENTAL DISTRICTS, TAX INCREMENTAL FINANCING
Attachments: 1. Amendment No. 1 to Project Plan.pdf, 2. Department of City Development Letter 10-20-09.pdf, 3. Fiscal Note.pdf, 4. Fiscal Analysis, 5. Hearing Notice List, 6. Wisconsin Department of Revenue Letter
Number
090791
Version
ORIGINAL
Reference

Sponsor
THE CHAIR
Title
Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the Project Plan for Tax Incremental District No. 56, Erie/Jefferson Street Riverwalk, in the 4th Aldermanic District.
Analysis
This resolution approves donating funds from TID No. 56 to TID No. 35, 27th/Wisconsin, and to TID No. 69, The New Avenue Commerce Center Project/24th and North. TID Nos. 35 and 69 are not generating incremental revenue and neither district has immediate prospects for redevelopment, which would produce such an increment. It is proposed that TID No. 56 donate sufficient revenue to these districts to completely retire their project costs and to cause the districts to be closed out. TID No. 56 has sufficient surplus revenue to accomplish this with donations over two years.
Body
Whereas, Chapter 105 of the Laws of 1975 of the State of Wisconsin with amendments from other chapters of said laws created Section 66.1105, Wisconsin Statutes, titled “Tax Increment Law;” and

Whereas, Boundaries and a Project Plan for Tax Incremental District (“TID”) No. 56, Erie/Jefferson Street Riverwalk, were approved by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee (“Authority”) and the Common Council of the City of Milwaukee (“Common Council”) in 2004; and

Whereas, Tax Increment Law allows tax incremental districts, under certain circumstances, to donate revenues to other tax incremental districts in the same municipality and, generally, these circumstances are:

The “Donor” and the “Recipient” districts must have the same overlying taxing jurisdictions.

The amendment to donate funds must be made before the Donor district has recovered all of its project costs.

The Recipient district must have been created upon a finding that not less than 50 percent, by area, of the real property in the district is blighted, or is in need of rehabilitation; or, its project plan provided funds to create or rehabilitate low-cost housing or to remediate e...

Click here for full text