| 12/22/2021 | 0 |
CITY CLERK
| Sponsor added
Minutes note: They fired the designer and are prohibited from using the approved plans, per Tim Askin, HPC. | | |
Action details
|
Meeting details
|
Not available
|
| 6/14/2021 | 0 |
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
| ADOPTED
Minutes note: Mr. Tim Askin said sub-par landscaping work was done and there were defects in the construction and it worsened the drainage issues on the neighboring properties. The driveway was poured while a stop-work order was in effect. The steps have to meet building code as they are the only means of egress from the front door. The houses are close as there are 4 houses on 2-3 lots. There is also a structure in the back yard that touches a neighbor's house that was never approved. The neighbor objects to this project as the prior work also worsened her drainage issues. A new landscape plan was submitted and it was done by a professional company, Flagstone. They propose to re-do the retaining wall, re-build the steps, re-do the driveway to correct drainage and remove all the timbers in the front yard. The neighbor is asking that the walkway on the west side by re-done to address drainage; that would need to be added. Mr. Askin thinks it's reasonable as proposed.
Atty. Tom Gartner for the owners.
Bob Travis - he did a survey and the west walkway is on his property and the window wells are on her property. They would like to put paving stones along that walkway. The wood rack is on his property and not touching her house. He objects to moving the wood rack, which isn't an HPC issue. He wants something done with that west walkway and he would like a condition that the adjacent owner has to agree that he can touch her window well.
Grant, as proposed and they will need to settle the west walkway matter between themselves. That is satisfactory to the homeowners. | Pass | 5:0 |
Action details
|
Meeting details
|
Video
|