powered help
header-left header-center header-right
File #: 090162    Version:
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 5/27/2009 In control: ZONING, NEIGHBORHOODS & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
On agenda: Final action: 7/28/2009
Effective date: 8/14/2009    
Title: A substitute ordinance relating to policies and procedures for disposition of city-owned real estate.
Sponsors: ALD. BAUMAN
Indexes: CITY PROPERTY, PROPERTY SALES
Attachments: 1. Fiscal Note, 2. Hearing Notice List, 3. Notice Published on 8-13-09
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultTallyAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
8/13/20092 CITY CLERK PUBLISHED   Action details Meeting details Not available
8/6/20092 MAYOR SIGNED   Action details Meeting details Not available
7/28/20091 CITY CLERK DRAFT SUBMITTED   Action details Meeting details Not available
7/28/20091 COMMON COUNCIL SUBSTITUTED

Minutes note: Ald. Bauman moved that this matter be held pending the creation of a mark-up version for all members. There was no objection. Ald. Bauman submitted and moved to accept a Proposed Substitute.
Pass14:0 Action details Meeting details Not available
7/28/20092 COMMON COUNCIL PASSEDPass14:0 Action details Meeting details Not available
7/21/20091 ZONING, NEIGHBORHOODS & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED FOR PASSAGE

Minutes note: Individuals appearing: Elaine Miller, DCD-Real Estate Art Dahlberg, Department of Neighborhood Services Ald. Bauman says that the ordinance amends an existing ordinance regarding the disposition of city-owned real estate. Ms. Miller says that there will be higher standards for property sold to investors instead of owner-occupants.
Pass4:0 Action details Meeting details Not available
7/16/20091 ZONING, NEIGHBORHOODS & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE HEARING NOTICES SENT   Action details Meeting details Not available
7/16/20091 ZONING, NEIGHBORHOODS & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE HEARING NOTICES SENT   Action details Meeting details Not available
7/15/20091 ZONING, NEIGHBORHOODS & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE HEARING NOTICES SENT   Action details Meeting details Not available
6/29/20091 CITY CLERK DRAFT SUBMITTED   Action details Meeting details Not available
6/29/20091 CITY CLERK DRAFT SUBMITTED   Action details Meeting details Not available
5/27/20090 COMMON COUNCIL ASSIGNED TO   Action details Meeting details Not available
Number
090162
Version
SUBSTITUTE 2
Reference

Sponsor
ALD. BAUMAN
Title
A substitute ordinance relating to policies and procedures for disposition of city-owned real estate.
Sections
304-49-2 rc
304-49-4 rc
304-49-8-0 am
Analysis
Currently, the commissioner of city development periodically provides the common council with a report listing, by aldermanic district, city-owned vacant lots and improved parcels containing 4 or fewer housing units (i.e., “neighborhood properties”) that are recommended for disposition. This ordinance modifies this report procedure to require that the commissioner, in consultation with the local common council member, classify each improved neighborhood property in one of the following categories, with the category designation noted on the report:

a. Habitable Property. This property is habitable in its current condition or can be rendered habitable with reasonable effort and funds proportionate to the assessed value of the property. The property shall be marketed to private purchasers for owner-occupancy. If rehabilitation or restoration is required, the property shall not be sold until the commissioner of neighborhood services has approved a restoration plan for the property and the commissioner of city development has certified that the prospective purchaser has the skills and financial resources to carry out the plan.

b. Uninhabitable Property. This property is not habitable in its current condition and cannot be rendered habitable with reasonable effort and funds proportionate to the assessed value of the property. The property shall be designated for demolition or deconstruction and shall not be subject to further disposition action.

c. Special Consideration Property. This property is not habitable in its current condition and is unlikely to be restored or rehabilitated by a private purchaser because the scope of work exceeds the amount of work that a private purchaser would reasonably be able to complete. ...

Click here for full text