powered help
header-left header-center header-right
File #: 020166    Version: 0
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 5/14/2002 In control: JUDICIARY & LEGISLATION COMMITTEE
On agenda: Final action: 6/4/2002
Effective date:    
Title: Resolution authorizing settlement of the claim for attorney's fees and costs in Deida v. City of Milwaukee, et al., Case No. 01-C-0324. (City Attorney)
Sponsors: THE CHAIR
Indexes: LITIGATION, SUITS PAYMENT
Attachments: 1. City Atty Cover Letter.pdf, 2. Fiscal Note.pdf, 3. Fiscal Review Analysis.pdf
Number
020166
Version
ORIGINAL
Reference

Sponsor
THE CHAIR
Title
Resolution authorizing settlement of the claim for attorney's fees and costs in Deida v. City of Milwaukee, et al., Case No. 01-C-0324. (City Attorney)
Analysis
This resolution authorizes payment of the claim for attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $12,614.71.
Body
Whereas, This case arose out of the arrest of Rosemary Deida for placing religious tracts under the windshield wipers of vehicles, in violation of Milwaukee City Ordinance 101-3, which adopts § 346.94(4), Wis. Stats. The ordinance and statute prohibit the placement of leaflets on vehicles on a public highway; however they permit the placement of educational materials relating to the parking privileges of the physically disabled on vehicles that appear to be illegally parked in spaces reserved for the physically disabled; and

Whereas, The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, the Honorable Lynn Adelman presiding, held the ordinance and statute unconstitutional under the First Amendment, which grants to the public the right to speak freely. The court held that the restriction was not content-neutral, and that there was no compelling governmental interest to justify the restriction. The court issued a permanent injunction against enforcement of the ordinance to the extent it adopts § 346.94(4), Wis. Stats., and awarded attorney's fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. § 1988; and

Whereas, The City Attorney has concluded that an appeal of the court's decision is not warranted; and

Whereas, Counsel for the plaintiff applied to the court for $20,592.21 of attorney's fees and costs, and the City Attorney objected to portions of the fees' request; and

Whereas, Plaintiff's counsel has agreed to settle his claim for fees and costs in the amount of $12,614.71; and

Whereas, The City Attorney recommends and the Common Council of the City of Milwaukee deems it expeditious and just ...

Click here for full text