Legislation Details

File #: 260104    Version: 0
Type: Resolution-Immediate Adoption Status: Mayor's Office
File created: 5/12/2026 In control: COMMON COUNCIL
On agenda: Final action: 5/12/2026
Effective date:    
Title: Resolution expressing the City of Milwaukee's opposition to the recent ruling by the Supreme Court relating to the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
Sponsors: COMMON COUNCIL
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultTallyAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
5/12/20260 COMMON COUNCIL  

Minutes note: Ald. Chambers moved for unanimous consensus for sponsorship.
   Not available Meeting details Not available
IMMEDIATE ADOPTION

Number
260104
Version
ORIGINAL
Reference

Sponsor
COMMON COUNCIL
Title
Resolution expressing the City of Milwaukee's opposition to the recent ruling by the Supreme Court relating to the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

Analysis
This resolution expresses the City of Milwaukee’s opposition to the United States Supreme Court’s April 29, 2026 decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which limited the use of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in redistricting matters. The resolution further reaffirms the City’s support for the protection of voting rights, equal access to the political process, and the continued enforcement of federal voting rights protections.

Body
Whereas, The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a landmark federal civil rights law enacted to prohibit racial discrimination in voting and to enforce the guarantees of the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and

Whereas, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act has long served as a critical protection against voting practices and electoral structures that weaken the voting strength of racial minority communities; and

Whereas, On April 29, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, striking down a Louisiana congressional map and weakening Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act; and

Whereas, Louisiana v. Callais limits the circumstances under which compliance with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act may justify race-conscious redistricting; and

Whereas, The decision makes it more difficult to challenge discriminatory district maps by requiring proof that mapmakers intentionally drew districts to disadvantage voters because of race; and

Whereas, The dissenting Justices warned that the decision may limit minority voters’ ability to elect candidates of their choice; and

Whereas, The City of Milwaukee has a strong interest in protecting the voting rights of all residents and ensuring that every eligible voter has access to and engagement with t...

Click here for full text