powered help
header-left header-center header-right
File #: 201313    Version:
Type: Resolution Status: In Committee
File created: 1/19/2021 In control: JUDICIARY & LEGISLATION COMMITTEE
On agenda: Final action:
Effective date:    
Title: Substitute resolution directing the Department of Administration-Intergovernmental Relations Division to lobby the Federal Highway Administration to deny the Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s request for re-issuance of a Record of Decision relating to reconstruction and modernization of Interstate 94 between 16th Street and 70th Street.
Sponsors: ALD. BAUMAN, ALD. MURPHY
Indexes: EXPRESSWAYS
Attachments: 1. Letter from Four Labor Unions in Opposition to Resolution, 2. Letter to Governor Evers - National Association of Minority Contractors Wisconsin Chapter (003), 3. Milwaukee Journal sentinel - Scott Walker, 4. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - Wisconsin Abandoned, 5. Video JL-201313-PW-201224, 6. Milwaukee Area Labor Council Letter, 7. City of Milwaukee Resolution Opposed To Expansion Of I-94, 8. CMRT Better Alternatives Hand-Out 8.2015.pdf, 9. 1 NAACP v. ROSS COMPLAINT filed 2017 03 01.pdf, 10. 2013 05 10 court decision and order on motion for prelim injunction.pdf, 11. CMRT I-94 FEIS Letter to Sec. Foxx FINAL (1).pdf, 12. Coalition Statement -- Transportation Advocates Applaud Gov. Evers Task Force Recommendations, Urge I-94 Expansion Rejection 12.9.20.pdf, 13. Gwen Moore letter to Sec. Foxx I94 East-West 2016 June 16.pdf, 14. MICAH Statement
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultTallyAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
2/9/20211 COMMON COUNCIL REFERRED TOPass15:0 Action details Meeting details Not available
2/1/20210 JUDICIARY & LEGISLATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION

Minutes note: Appearing: Ald. Bauman - Sponsor Ald. Murphy - project located in 10th Aldermanic District David Jasenski - District 10 constituant and member of the Public Transportation Committee Joyce Ellwanger - support of this project Ald. Murphy asked to be co-sponsor. There were no objections
Pass5:0 Action details Meeting details Video Video
1/22/20211 CITY CLERK DRAFT SUBMITTED   Action details Meeting details Not available
1/19/20210 COMMON COUNCIL ASSIGNED TO   Action details Meeting details Not available
Number
201313
Version
SUBSTITUTE 1
Reference

Sponsor
ALD. BAUMAN AND MURPHY
Title
Substitute resolution directing the Department of Administration-Intergovernmental Relations Division to lobby the Federal Highway Administration to deny the Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s request for re-issuance of a Record of Decision relating to reconstruction and modernization of Interstate 94 between 16th Street and 70th Street.
Analysis
This resolution directs the Department of Administration-Intergovernmental Relations Division to lobby the Federal Highway Administration to deny the Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s request for re-issuance of a Record of Decision relating to reconstruction and modernization of Interstate 94 between 16th Street and 70th Street.
Body
Whereas, In July, 2020, Governor Tony Evers announced that he would be seeking federal approval of the rebuilding of Interstate 94 between 16th and 70th Streets in Milwaukee; and

Whereas, On December 9, 2020, the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission approved the 2021-2024 regional Transportation Improvement Program (“TIP”); and

Whereas, Project No. 56 is the TIP is described as:

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RESULTING FROM THE NEPA PROCESSES’ RECORD OF DECISION FOR RECONSTRUCTIUON & MODERNIZATION OF IH 94 (EAST-WEST FREEWAY) FROM 70TH ST TO 16TH ST IN THE CITY OF MILWAUKEE (3.5 MI) State ID:1060-27-02

; and

Whereas, As noted in the TIP, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (“WisDOT”) is currently reassessing alternatives developed as part of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process previously conducted for this project, including alternatives with and without additional travel lanes; and

Whereas, Following completion of this alternatives analysis and selection of a preferred alternative, WisDOT will seek a Record of Decision from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); and

Whereas, While the FHWA issued a Record of Decision for ...

Click here for full text