powered help
header-left header-center header-right
File #: 200324    Version:
Type: Resolution Status: In Committee
File created: 7/7/2020 In control: JUDICIARY & LEGISLATION COMMITTEE
On agenda: Final action:
Effective date:    
Title: Substitute resolution directing the Department of Administration-Intergovernmental Relations Division to seek introduction and passage of state legislation that would prohibit the use of chemical deterrents by local law enforcement agencies for crowd control or dispersal.
Sponsors: ALD. RAINEY
Attachments: 1. PETITION.pdf
Number
200324
Version
SUBSTITUTE 1
Reference

Sponsor
ALD. RAINEY
Title
Substitute resolution directing the Department of Administration-Intergovernmental Relations Division to seek introduction and passage of state legislation that would prohibit the use of chemical deterrents by local law enforcement agencies for crowd control or dispersal.
Analysis
This resolution directs the Department of Administration - Intergovernmental Relations Division to seek introduction and passage of state legislation that would prohibit the use of chemical deterrents by local law enforcement agencies for crowd control or dispersal.

Body
Whereas, The Milwaukee Police Department uses the chemical deterrent CS (chlorobenzylidene malononitrile) spray for crowd control and dispersal; and

Whereas, Other law enforcement agencies throughout the state use CS spray or another form of tear gas as a chemical deterrent to control and disperse crowds; and

Whereas, CS spray, other forms of tear gas and chemical deterrents in general cause a burning sensation in the eyes as well as profuse tearing, making it all but impossible to keep the eyes open, irritating the mucous membranes of the nose, mouth and throat, resulting in coughing, nasal discharge, disorientation, difficulty breathing and partial incapacitation; and

Whereas, The use of chemical deterrents like CS spray and other forms of tear gas for crowd control or dispersal indiscriminately affects all persons in a crowd, including persons gathering peacefully to express social concerns, and can threaten the health and safety of peaceful persons in a crowd; and

Whereas, The use of chemical deterrents like CS spray and other forms of tear gas for crowd control or dispersal can escalate rather than deescalate tensions between the local law enforcement agencies and a crowd expressing social concerns, exacerbating the situation and provoking a violent reaction; and

Whereas, Prohibiting the use of chemical deterrents like C...

Click here for full text