powered help
header-left header-center header-right
File #: 970890    Version:
Type: Resolution Status: Placed On File
File created: 9/23/1997 In control: PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
On agenda: Final action: 10/14/1997
Effective date:    
Title: Substitute resolution seeking introduction and passage of state legislation relating to uniform regulation of jaywalking.
Sponsors: ALD. PAWLINSKI
Indexes: CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS, STATE LEGISLATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL REGULATIONS
NUMB:
970890
VERS:
SUBSTITUTE 1
REF:

XXBY:
ALD. PAWLINSKI
TITL:
Substitute resolution seeking introduction and passage of state legislation relating to uniform regulation of jaywalking.
ANLS:
- Analysis -

This resolution directs the Intergovernmental Relations Division - Department of Administration to seek introduction and passage of state legislation to permit pedestrians to cross streets at controlled intersections, uncontrolled intersections, corners and mid-block whenever such crossing does not impede vehicles or countermand the directions of a law enforcement officer or school crossing guard, safety cadet or other authorized person directing traffic.
BODY:
Whereas, Regulations for pedestrian crossing of streets are set by state statute; and

Whereas, State law currently prohibits all pedestrian crossings when vehicles may be impeded or when law enforcement officers are directing traffic, but is inconsistent in other circumstances; and

Whereas, These inconsistent provisions allow pedestrians to cross streets in some circumstances, such as at mid-block and at uncontrolled intersections, but prohibit crossing at other times, such as at some controlled intersections with "don't walk" lights; and

Whereas, Under existing state law, a small group of persons crossing a street together may technically include both lawbreakers and law-abiding pedestrians; and

Whereas, Jaywalking laws have recently been subject to strict enforcement as "quality of life" violations but the discrepancies in state regulations may make such enforcement appear inconsistent; and

Whereas, Visitors to Milwaukee cannot be expected to understand such inconsistent legal rules; and

Whereas, Penalizing pedestrian tourists for their inadvertent violations of state law may create a negative impression of Milwaukee among visitors to the city; and

Whereas, The existing inconsistency in regulation of pedestrians crossing streets is unnecessary, confusin...

Click here for full text