From: Hatala, Carlen
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:34 AM
To: Elmer, Linda
Subject: FW: Copy of objection letter regarding vote on Goll Mansion development
Linda,
Can you see if this letter can be distributed to the aldermen before their vote?  I am not sure if we were just copied or if he wanted us to forward this to the Common Council.
Thanks,
Carlen


From: Dennis Burgener [mailto:dburgener@mcwba.com]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 12:56 PM
To: historicpreservation
Subject: Copy of objection letter regarding vote on Goll Mansion development

 

CC of objection letter to Aldermen regarding the upcoming Common Council vote on zoning change for the Goll Mansion development:

 

VIA E-MAIL

October 6, 2008                                                                                                                     

 

Common Council Members

City of Milwaukee

City Hall

200 East Wells Street

Milwaukee, WI 53202

 

RE:       Objection to Change in Zoning

10-7-08 Common Council Agenda, ZND Item 1, file #080543, regarding the

Goll Mansion site located at 1550 N. Prospect Avenue, Zoning District 4

 

Dear Alderman:

 

I respectfully request your vote against the above referenced matter.

 

I do not live at the condominium �1522 on the Lake�, but I do live and work in the city.  My architectural firm has received two Mayor�s Urban Design Awards, a Cream of the Cream City Award, and was featured on the HGTV television show, Homes Across America, that showcased my saving the pre-Civil War era Michelstetter building in the historic Brewer�s Hill neighborhood.

 

I preface my request this way because I have always supported good urban development principles and the preservation of historic buildings in my work. I do not object to development, or the concept of development as a means of preserving the Goll Mansion.  Rather, I object to the failure to demand that it be resolved in a way that is consistent with the city�s urban design principles and the zoning requirements created to help enforce those principles. 

 

These parts of the development have not been resolved:

1.       The proposed building does not meet the street. It sits five stories above the ground. Virtually every other building including the University Club, Kilbourn Tower, US Bank, Pier Wisconsin, and the Art Museum meet the street because their parking is concealed in some manner.

2.       The proposed five story parking garage is too close (6� feet) to the Goll Mansion given the disproportion in scale of the two. Besides violating basic design principles it violates our own zoning code. To not demand more to fix this spacing will surely cause national design and historic groups to disparage the city for not doing more.

3.       Mechanical equipment proposed to be mounted outside the building. Forty air conditioning units and associated mechanical equipment are proposed to be mounted on the exterior, two per floor, the full height of the west facade facing the city. Tall buildings have no �bad� mechanical side where equipment can be placed because they are universally recognized to be observed from all sides.

 

Other unresolved issues are the poor connection of the Goll Mansion to the proposed new building, the large garage door fronting the street, and the misuse of �green� elements to hide the parking behemoth.

 

Prospect Avenue is one of our city�s most important streets. Buildings that comprise our skyline define our city�s image.  Although this development will be privately owned, its presence will affect the public in a very direct way.  If the vote is cast for this zoning change, all residents of and visitors to this city for the next 50-100 years will be living with its consequences.  When we care so little about how development occurs on important sites, we cannot expect to influence good development on any site.

 

No world-class city, or one that has such aspirations, would vote to approve this matter and ask so little of a development on the site of a registered historic structure. Nor would any world-class city allow the suggestion of destruction of that historic structure to be used as a lever in gaining approval of a poorly resolved development.

 

Our city’s architecture, and how we care for and nurture its growth, is one of the most visible statements of the strength, or the weakness of our city.  Voting against this item shows our strength; voting for it shows our weakness.

 

Sincerely,

Dennis Burgener, AIA

McWilliams Burgener Architecture

735 North Water Street, Suite 727

Milwaukee, WI 53202

414-374-1744