Chris: Please add to file.
Jim
Jim
Owczarski
Deputy City
Clerk
City of
Milwaukee
(414)-286-2998
http://milwaukee.legistar.com
From: Hatala, Carlen
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 11:51 AM
To: Owczarski,
Jim
Subject: FW: Historic Preservation
proposal
Jim,
Should
this be included as part of the record?
Carlen
From: phfmke1@juno.com [mailto:phfmke1@juno.com]
Sent:
Friday, March 30, 2012 2:14 PM
To: Witkowski, Terry
Cc:
Bauman, Robert; ayrisB@aol.com; Hatala,
Carlen; ripp4@usa.net; Jakubovich, Paul;
Kovac, Nik
Subject: Historic Preservation
proposal
Dear Alderman Witkowski,
Based on HPC's and citizens' feedback at the March 27th
meeting, it makes sense that you make the suggested changes to your proposal,
amending it so that all that transpired can avoid being repeated at
further public hearings.
Milwaukee benefits greatly from historic preservation, and
the Historic Preservation Commission is an excellent safeguard for related
procedures by the Common Council. Applicants and developers can't simply
be given a bypass to HPC procedures by having the Common Council decide on any
CoA that has been on file for more than 90 days. That the Marriott
received a Common Council action before HPC had completed its
negotiations with them, did not speak well or serve the City
well.
HPC clarified at the March 27th meeting that most of the 12
points covered aren't needed, and that only a few of their policies and
guidelines would benefit by updating, streamlining and clarification.
Eliminate what isn't needed, and meet with them to achieve updated clarification
on the remainder. Put in place safeguards against demolition by neglect,
and maintain the City's power to control developments that impact Milwaukee's
Historic Preservation.
Sincerely,
Pamela Frautschi & Richard Ippolito
2430 E. Newberry Blvd, Milw 53211
____________________________________________________________
Groupon™
Official Site
1
ridiculously huge coupon a day. Get 50-90% off your city's
best!
Groupon.com